prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Comparison of apical irrigant solution extrusion among conventional and laser-activated endodontic irrigation
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Comparison of apical irrigant solution extrusion among conventional and laser-activated endodontic irrigation
Lasers in Medical Science, 35 (2020), 1; 205-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02846-w
Vidas, Jelena; Šnjarić, Damir; Braut, Alen; Čarija, Zoran; Peršić Bukmir, Romana; De Moor, Roeland J. G.; Brekalo Pršo, Ivana

Cite this document

Vidas, J., Šnjarić, D., Braut, A., Čarija, Z., Peršić Bukmir, R., De Moor, R. J. G. & Brekalo Pršo, I. (2020). Comparison of apical irrigant solution extrusion among conventional and laser-activated endodontic irrigation. Lasers in Medical Science, 35. (1), 205-211. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02846-w

Vidas, Jelena, et al. "Comparison of apical irrigant solution extrusion among conventional and laser-activated endodontic irrigation." Lasers in Medical Science, vol. 35, no. 1, 2020, pp. 205-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02846-w

Vidas, Jelena, Damir Šnjarić, Alen Braut, Zoran Čarija, Romana Peršić Bukmir, Roeland J. G. De Moor and Ivana Brekalo Pršo. "Comparison of apical irrigant solution extrusion among conventional and laser-activated endodontic irrigation." Lasers in Medical Science 35, no. 1 (2020): 205-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02846-w

Vidas, J., et al. (2020) 'Comparison of apical irrigant solution extrusion among conventional and laser-activated endodontic irrigation', Lasers in Medical Science, 35(1), pp. 205-211. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02846-w

Vidas J, Šnjarić D, Braut A, Čarija Z, Peršić Bukmir R, De Moor RJG, and sur.. Comparison of apical irrigant solution extrusion among conventional and laser-activated endodontic irrigation. Lasers in Medical Science [Internet]. 2020 January 18 [cited 2024 December 16];35(1):205-211. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02846-w

J. Vidas, et al., "Comparison of apical irrigant solution extrusion among conventional and laser-activated endodontic irrigation", Lasers in Medical Science, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 205-211, January 2020. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:271:834225. [Accessed: 16 December 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Comparison of apical irrigant solution extrusion among conventional and laser-activated endodontic irrigation
AuthorJelena Vidas
AuthorDamir Šnjarić
AuthorAlen Braut
AuthorZoran Čarija
AuthorRomana Peršić Bukmir
AuthorRoeland J. G. De Moor
AuthorIvana Brekalo Pršo
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
(Faculty of Dental Medicine)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Dental Medicine
Endodonics and Restorative Dentistry
Abstract (english)
The aim of this study was to determine the amount of extruded endodontic irrigant among needle-syringe irrigation (NSI) and laser- activated irrigation (LAI) regimens. Twenty extracted maxillary central incisors were prepared utilizing GT professional rotary files (size 40, taper 0.06). Irrigation was performed with two 27 G irrigation needles (notched open ended (ON) and single side vented (SV)) each at two different irrigant volumetric flow rates (VFR)-0.05 ml/s (3 ml/min) and 0.10 ml/s (6 ml/min). LAI was performed with Er:YAG (erbium- doped yttrium aluminum garnet) using different fiber types (X-Pulse-14/400 cylindrical tip, Preciso- 14/300 flat cylindrical tip, PIPS- 14/400 quartz tapered tip). The Er:YAG laser with a wavelength of 2940 nm (Lightwalker AT, Fotona, Ljubljana, Slovenia) was used according to the following protocol: 10 mJ per pulse, 15 Hz, pulse duration 50 μs. Irrigation time was 60 s for all protocols. Precision syringe pump (PSP) maintained constant irrigant volumetric flow rate. Apically extruded irrigant was collected and net weighed for each protocol (N = 10). Data were analyzed by t tests and Kruskal-Wallis. All LAI regimens had statistically significant lower irrigant extrusion compared with NSI except for the SV 27 G needle used with 0.05 ml/s VFR when compared with the Preciso fiber tip (p = 0, 230). The largest amount of extruded irrigant was with the ON 27 G needle at the 0.10 ml/s VFR, while the smallest was after LAI with PIPS fiber tip. The lower quantity of apically extruded irrigant during LAI (X-Pulse and PIPS) points out a safer endodontic irrigation method compared with conventional irrigations
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleLasers in Medical Science
Numberingvol. 35, no. 1, pp. 205-211
p-ISSN0268-8921
e-ISSN1435-604X
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02846-w
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:271:834225
Publication2020-01-18
Document URLhttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10103-019-02846-w
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsInstitutional access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2023-01-19 09:31:15